Re: Rogue Males by Lionel Tiger

From: Francesca S. Alcorn (
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 06:51:29 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "RE: The Symbolic Species"

    Received: by id GAA02926 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:55:15 GMT
    Message-Id: <p04320404b87a7a4c7d4d@[]>
    In-Reply-To: <>
    References: <> <> <>
    Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 01:51:29 -0500
    From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <>
    Subject: Re: Rogue Males by Lionel Tiger
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    Precedence: bulk

    stephen said:

    >Female sexuality has to be inferred. It cannot be gotten directly
    >through questioning or any other means, irrespective of whether the
    >questioner is a man or a woman. Ask a woman what she likes, and her
    >answers could mean just about anything.

    Except of course, what she *actually* said. You *are* hopeless. :)

    I have no doubt that there is a dark side to the female gender/sex
    role, there is a dark side to everything. But your obsession with
    this, coupled with your refusal to even admit the dark side of other
    social structures (for instance Islam, and women's oppression under
    it) hardly seems evenhanded.

    And may the force be with you.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 07:35:34 GMT