Re: Abstractism

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 03:22:22 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Fw: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by id CAA02345 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 02:29:11 GMT
    Message-ID: <00b401c1a7ab$00e15c60$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <>
    To: <>
    References: <> <00af01c1a479$ac039ac0$aa86b2d1@teddace> <01cc01c1a4b6$22e1a1a0$6621aace@oemcomputer> <007b01c1a5cf$dc9d6380$2cc2b3d1@teddace> <001901c1a5f4$d071b280$2503aace@oemcomputer> <001d01c1a761$1dd13240$f686b2d1@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Abstractism
    Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:22:22 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Precedence: bulk

    > > Moreover it is likely to be a function of
    > > time as well as you constantly update, modify and increase your
    > > knowledge database. With abstract description of one particular meme
    > > I meant a description captured in language (or other mode of
    > > communication) which may be more or less the same in all of the hosts
    > > at hand.

    > In other words, the meme itself is in our minds, while the neural
    > in our brains vary from person to person.

    Exactly. Memes are expressed in the mind alright but each meme has an
    accompanying neural correlate in the brain, patterns of nervous activity
    which are impossible to pin down (at least at the current stage of
    neuroscientific research).


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 02:50:27 GMT