Re: sex and the single meme

Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:25:56 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Selfish meme?"

    Received: by id WAA26842 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:32:19 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:25:56 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Message-ID: <3C51E984.23852.2165D1@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <002501c1a5e3$038b3ae0$b3a0bed4@default>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    On 25 Jan 2002, at 21:57, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:

    > << Their own evolutionary disposition of being pro- life for themselves.
    > Memes just use you and me, this list, the Net to put forward their own
    > progency. All the ones who are around, in all their forms possible, are
    > the ones who survived and will thrive.

    Actually it can be seen from both sides.

    Taking the "memes are selfish - we carry them" side. Which selfish
    memes will survive? Answer: Those who stay around with us and
    get copied more than others. Which memes do stay around with
    us? Answer: Memes which help us dna-beings to survive. There's
    the circle. Those memes survive which help us to survive.

    Someday culture might take of, but as of today we as humans are
    the little executive elements of culture. In one way we as
    individuals help the culture to survive, in the other way around
    culture helps us to survive.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 23:06:21 GMT