Re: sex and the single meme

From: Wade T. Smith (
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:03:52 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by id WAA26721 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:08:09 GMT
    Message-Id: <>
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:03:52 -0500
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T. Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Scott Chase -

    >Are there other cases
    >where numerically limited subsets of humans have broken off and had
    >higher/lower prevalence of genetically base traits contrasted to the
    >parental population due to drift?

    Besides royal families and rampant idiocy, not to mention ugliness, and,
    oh yeah, hemophilia?

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:21:58 GMT