Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA26072 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:22:17 GMT From: <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:16:26 +0100 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: sex and the single meme Message-ID: <3C51AF0A.1532.77E487@localhost> References: <3C517DCA.8933.B52ABD@localhost> In-reply-to: <2AA62CD4-11BC-11D6-A35A-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On 25 Jan 2002, at 12:51, Wade Smith wrote:
> > Yes, but most touches result from brain activity.
> Not being touched. Admittedly, one knows that one is touched
> because the brain and the sensory apparatus are intact and
> functioning, but that is not what we are talking about.
Okay Wade, the discussion was about memetic selection and
whether i get touched by some meme, like some song for
instance, does indeed define my brain.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 18:38:35 GMT