RE: Brain_disease_shaped_Ravel's_Bolero

Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:05:17 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "RE: Brain_disease_shaped_Ravel's_Bolero"

    Received: by id NAA22781 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:11:14 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:05:17 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Brain_disease_shaped_Ravel's_Bolero
    Message-ID: <3C50149D.21656.482E55@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    On 23 Jan 2002, at 19:33, Grant Callaghan wrote:

    > Yep, but not as completely or as compactly. The amazing thing to me is that
    > the child seems to retain the same basic personality. Either hemisphere can
    > be removed wihout removing the personality. So where in the brain are we?
    > "We" must be a function of the system rather than a part of the brain.

    I think the personality lies in the connection between different brain
    parts, for example if some memory is linked with some emotional
    output. So there's no single place where "we" exist but we are in all
    the different connections.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:27:50 GMT