Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA19265 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:26:13 GMT From: <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:20:26 +0100 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Recursive def. of the meme Message-ID: <3C4EB89A.24479.53A341@localhost> In-reply-to: <200201230453.g0N4r3x25216@mail15.bigmailbox.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 22 Jan 2002, at 20:53, Joe Dees wrote:
> Nope. Genes are obviously copiable; it happens every day.
> They are also obviously not memes.
Not so obvious i'd say. With genetic development at hand, genetic
information becomes valuable, copyable by humans, and part of a
small set of cultural environment.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 12:34:07 GMT