Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA14281 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:06:38 GMT X-Originating-IP: [184.108.40.206] From: "Grant Callaghan" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:02:10 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <LAW2-F131Er8pkpLkTg000064ed@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2002 23:02:11.0155 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8798230:01C1A2CF] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>>>Anyway, since I already have been using the various terms "idea,"
>>>"behavior," "artifact," "thought contagion," "doctrine," "opinion,"
>>>system," and "urban legend," I find no communication difficulty arising
>>>not using the word "meme" alongside them. My book chapter "Evolutionary
>>>Contagion in Mental Software"
>>What I dislike in the choice of the word "contagion" to describe the
>>of information is the implication that the receiver has no choice but to
>>"infected" by the idea. It also has connotations of sickness and a
>>that leads to death. Most of the bacteria and a lot of the viruses that
>>invade our body do so harmlessly. Some are killers. But we have little
>>choice about catching the flu or HIV. I don't believe this is the case
>>memes. Although some memes, if taken up by a large enough number of
>>can lead to sickness within a society and the death of many of its
>>the overall effect of memes is to make the society stronger and allow us
>>adapt to a changing environment that is changing too quickly for genetic
>>evolution to keep up with. It seems to me the terms "virus" and
>>were chosen to create fear and controversey. They are loaded with
>>baggage from historical attempts to survive plagues and their aftermath.
>>Emotion laden terminology should be kept out of the study of culture and
>>mind if we are to reach objective conclusions about them.
>"Contagion" may be apt for uses in certain cases though not a term to focus
>upon to the exclusion of other possibilities. I'm an agnostic on memes so
>I'm open to other terms and other views.
>There's a plethora of terms (erroneous or not) out there which refer to
>stuff influencing human individual and social behavior. It might be neat to
>construct a taxonomy of these terms, though I'm only aware of a limited
>number such as meme, mind virus, contagion, culturgen, engram, mnemon,
>complex, idee' fixe, collective representation, archetype and so on.
I think ONE of the reasons we chose to couch the ideas of science, law and
medicine in Latin and Greek words is bacause they didn't carry with them the
emotional baggage of words we use to talk about our daily lives. Words like
honor, duty, country and faith rouse certain emotions that have been drilled
into us since birth. For scientific purposes and objectivity we have to
separate what we see from what we feel about it. Many a false theory has
sprung up because the researcher wanted to believe in it. My theory can
sometimes have as much of an emotional influence as my wife, my children, my
home or my faith. Emotions often shape what we believe rather than being
shaped by it.
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 23:20:20 GMT