Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA13562 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:09:38 GMT Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:05:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Why memeoids? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAGEPACJAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <0B465D19-0E91-11D6-AF48-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 08:29 , Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
> Can you say a bit more about what you mean by 'tribalism' and its
> Might it be possible to create a sense of a species-wide tribe? And
> this be at all helpful or harmful?
Well, I'll pull out the flowers, and say, well, I was thinking pretty
simply like a hippy. Us vs Them-ism. Tribalism.
Might it be possible to have a global village, all of us Us, none of us
It would be helpful, were it possible.
But, my cynicism kicks in overtime, and sees no possibility.
I want to be wrong.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 17:17:20 GMT