Re: Sensory and sensibility

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 00:16:06 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Sensory and sensibility and a big question"
  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Scientology"

    Received: by id AAA11121 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:19:58 GMT
    Message-Id: <>
    Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:16:06 -0500
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <>
    Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility
    Precedence: bulk

    --- Original Message ---
    From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <>
    Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility

    >Salice said:
    >> > Some developmental types suggest the 'self' is
    not intact until somewhere
    >>> in the fourth year.
    >>Is the 'self' required for memetic processes?
    >No, but perhaps the same thing that gives rise to
    memes also gives
    >rise to a our idea of self: the ability to create an
    >representation of something in our mind.

    Exactly... and is has a name too: the self-plex.
    See The Meme-Machine.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 00:39:51 GMT