Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA11121 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:19:58 GMT To: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-Id: <AA-28F91642FCE6E36A633883E5F2BE6481-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:16:06 -0500 From: "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net> Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
--- Original Message ---
From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility
>> > Some developmental types suggest the 'self' is
not intact until somewhere
>>> in the fourth year.
>>Is the 'self' required for memetic processes?
>No, but perhaps the same thing that gives rise to
memes also gives
>rise to a our idea of self: the ability to create an
>representation of something in our mind.
Exactly... and is has a name too: the self-plex.
See The Meme-Machine.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 00:39:51 GMT