Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA10552 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:03:00 GMT Message-ID: <010601c1a1fd$c7d7efe0$b186b2d1@teddace> From: "Dace" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <AA-58D24272F44CB21DAE529FE4BC2EA9A1-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net> Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:59:47 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Philip Jonkers
> What the guys in the artifact-behavior meme-camp argue
> is that it is wrong to speak of memes residing in the
> brain for no other reason that they don't fit with any
> of the current definitions. They are undetectable,
> highly personal and non-uniform in stored form.
While it's true that no one has ever found a meme in the brain, no one has
ever found a thought or a feeling or a memory or a perception or a desire or
any other mental function in the brain. Clearly, memes exist in minds. The
problem is trying to reduce mind to brain.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 22:10:56 GMT