Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA07435 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:27:45 GMT Message-Id: <email@example.com> X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:24:58 -0500 To: email@example.com From: Keith Henson <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Why memeoids? In-Reply-To: <F280GXix4A2DreBBsQw0002045f@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
At 12:47 PM 19/01/02 -0500, "Scott Chase" <email@example.com>
>>From: Keith Henson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>Subject: RE: Why memeoids?
>>Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:35:15 -0500
>>At 01:35 AM 19/01/02 -0500, "Scott Chase" <email@example.com>
>One of the discomforting aspects of Turkey, from what little I know, is
>the military's intervention into gov't affairs. There may be a slight
>parallel here with the present situation in Pakistan, where our buddy
>Musharraf became leader via military coup. Aren't things supposed to come
>to a head this year (2002) as far as Musharraf's position is concerned?
I don't know if this is all bad from the standpoint of fewer fanatic
radicals in power. The military is progressive in the sense that they
understand the value of secular technology.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 21:35:18 GMT