Re: sensory and sensibility

Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 18:00:03 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Scientology 3/4"

    Received: by id SAA03543 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:06:25 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:00:03 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: sensory and sensibility
    Message-ID: <3C4870B3.5011.27B2B1@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <p04320401b86decd53d08@[]>
    References: <>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    > It implies that we have abstracted certain qualities about an object,
    > and have an internal representation of such. Seems like it might be
    > a start.

    Wasn't platon already thinking about this? I can remember the
    example of the horses being all different from each other but we
    can all identify them as horses.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 21:15:44 GMT