Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA26781 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:26:31 GMT Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:21:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Has anybody read this book? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <09DB8FAF-0AC7-11D6-8B2C-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 03:55 , Keith Henson wrote:
> such people can change religions as often as underware.
Is that seriously offered as an uncommon or pathological condition?
I'm totally against such a thought. What religion you are,
culturally, is a cultural thing, completely. The fact you
_might_ want to approach any of them _could_ be hardwired.
But, I ain't convinced.
Whereas, I am convinced that stimulation of certain areas will
produce 'religious' or 'spiritual' or 'mystical' experiences,
and such experiences will come up against the wall of
understanding of their genesis, and that wall, up until very
recently, was filled with gods.
And now, it isn't.
Brave new world that has not such beings in it.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 21:37:53 GMT