Re: Has anybody read this book?

From: Wade Smith (
Date: Wed Jan 16 2002 - 21:21:43 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Modes of transmission"

    Received: by id VAA26781 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:26:31 GMT
    Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:21:43 -0500
    Subject: Re: Has anybody read this book?
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: Wade Smith <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 03:55 , Keith Henson wrote:

    > such people can change religions as often as underware.

    Is that seriously offered as an uncommon or pathological condition?

    I'm totally against such a thought. What religion you are,
    culturally, is a cultural thing, completely. The fact you
    _might_ want to approach any of them _could_ be hardwired.

    But, I ain't convinced.

    Whereas, I am convinced that stimulation of certain areas will
    produce 'religious' or 'spiritual' or 'mystical' experiences,
    and such experiences will come up against the wall of
    understanding of their genesis, and that wall, up until very
    recently, was filled with gods.

    And now, it isn't.

    Brave new world that has not such beings in it.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 21:37:53 GMT