Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA25535 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:32:57 GMT Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:28:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Message-Id: <A4C9DD32-0A95-11D6-8B2C-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 10:01 , Keith Henson wrote:
> Writing down a meme can slow its drift to nearly zero.
Of course, if the meme is only the artefact, there is no drift,
at all, other than the corrosion of time.
But, the meaning of this artefact changes constantly.
The meaning of the Parthenon friezes in the British Museum is
not the meaning they had when upon the Parthenon in Hellenic
If the meme is semantic content, how do we approach this change
in meaning? What stays the same, and what changes?
How can meme1 be meme2?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 16:14:39 GMT