Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA23582 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 16 Jan 2002 04:35:58 GMT Message-Id: <200201160431.g0G4VXS05471@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: RE: the earth revolves around the sun Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:31:35 -0500 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Joe Dees -
>Or is there such a thing as accidental dancing?
Yes, there is.
There is absolutely a process of rhythmic motion that is innate.
Well, it's not accidental, at all. It's very wrapped up in music and
speech and culture.
I don't know where to go with things like innate motivations and
processes memetically, because, while culture certainly contains and uses
these urges, it is so close to biological behavior that there doesn't
seem to be any need whatsoever for memetic content.
After all, bees dance. I believe most if not every human society has a
form of ritualized dance. There are many courtship dances among birds,
and fish, and insects.
So, yes, not 'accidental' but, without need for memetic conceptualization.
Once we get to the tango, then that's another matter.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 04:48:32 GMT