Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA22216 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:53:01 GMT Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:48:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3C448348.9452.C7B315@localhost> Message-Id: <CE13D540-09F0-11D6-922A-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 01:30 , <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hm so you could also take the "there are different classes of
From what I've seen of the arguments, that is a reasonable
stance, if somewhat crowded, like quarks and charm and up and
But that matrix works.
Like mother said, takes one to know one.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 20:00:08 GMT