Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Wade Smith (
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 19:48:10 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception"

    Received: by id TAA22216 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:53:01 GMT
    Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:48:10 -0500
    Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: Wade Smith <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <3C448348.9452.C7B315@localhost>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 01:30 , <> wrote:

    > Hm so you could also take the "there are different classes of
    > memes"-side.

     From what I've seen of the arguments, that is a reasonable
    stance, if somewhat crowded, like quarks and charm and up and

    But that matrix works.

    > Ass.

    Like mother said, takes one to know one.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 20:00:08 GMT