Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA20970 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:19:41 GMT Message-Id: <firstname.lastname@example.org> X-Sender: email@example.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 04:16:49 -0500 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: Keith Henson <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception In-Reply-To: <0B7310DC-0985-11D6-8D58-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
At 01:56 AM 15/01/02 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 01:09 , Keith Henson wrote:
>>As a result of it, phrenology is a relatively unpopular meme because it
>>was subjected to the scientific method and found wanting.
>As for why phrenology is not more popular in this day of feng shui, your
>guess is as good as mine.
I said why just above. Phrenology tried to become a meme within the
collection of science memes. It failed to pass the test. Ergo.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 09:45:10 GMT