Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA18051 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:09:04 GMT Message-Id: <200201141404.g0EE4aS16360@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:04:26 -0500 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <email@example.com> To: "memetics list" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 01/13/02 23:56, Jeremy Bradley said this-
>How is the use of a hammer diffrent to a hammer itself?
Well, the hammer is an actual, physical thing which can be utilized for
driving nails, or smashing windows, or opening cans.
The use of an actual, physical object is not the use of a meme- unless a
meme can be shown to be an actual, physical, object, and, so far, no-one
has brought one out for show and tell.
The use of a meme, is, in fact, the meme itself, and thus, 'the use' of a
meme, and the meme itself, are one and the same.
Not so with hammers.
So, I'll repeat my question-
>>And just how is the use of a meme different from the meme itself?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 14 2002 - 14:19:29 GMT