RE: playing at suicide

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 05:17:11 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: playing at suicide"

    Received: by id FAA14946 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 05:21:09 GMT
    Message-Id: <>
    Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 00:17:11 -0500
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <>
    Subject: RE: playing at suicide
    Precedence: bulk

    --- Original Message ---
    From: "Grant Callaghan" <>
    Subject: RE: playing at suicide

    >Thanks for the reply. I'm going to have to study
    your replies a while
    >before I get back to you. I wasn't trying to start
    an earthquake or
    >anything, just to counter the idea that memes are
    like selfish genes. But
    >there are several points in your replies that need
    some discussion and I'm
    >going to take some time to think about them first.

    No problem Grant, let's just say discussions and
    disputes keep the juices flowing. To say it more
    formally, they are quite indenspensable in scientific

    While you're at it, please give a definition of what
    you consider a tool (in memetics).
    I'm quite interested and all ear.



    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 13 2002 - 05:29:02 GMT