Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA07963 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:52:11 GMT X-vSMTP: intekom.com Message-ID: <email@example.com> From: "Pieter Bouwer" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D1CE@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3C3DA3EC.firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:45:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:23 PM Chris Taylor said:
> I think this is like hybridisation in the wild between
species - a new
> species may arise by combining parts of pre-existing ones.
> species is just as valid. I think the 'new' meme is
> from learned ones ...
Thank you Chris. This sounds quite acceptable to me. You are
saying the hybrid meme is subconsciously pieced together from
previously learned memes? I think I am getting somewhere.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 10 2002 - 15:59:36 GMT