RE: playing at suicide

From: Grant Callaghan (
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 03:26:34 GMT

  • Next message: Joachim Maier: "Re: playing at suicide"

    Received: by id DAA06434 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 03:31:02 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: []
    From: "Grant Callaghan" <>
    Subject: RE: playing at suicide
    Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 19:26:34 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2002 03:26:34.0520 (UTC) FILETIME=[9AD1E980:01C19986]
    Precedence: bulk

    >><<See previous posts on Grant's theory of memes.>>
    >>But by MY theory, a "Grant" is an overripe banana. Why would I want to
    >>a theory on knock-down, drag-out arguments from an overripe banana? I'm
    >>getting more and more confused.
    >You probably wouldn't. But it's not required reading unless you do want
    > The choice is yours to make. ;-)>
    P.S. I'm aware that you, too, have a theory of memes. I bought your book,
    but I didn't buy your theory. I have no doubt your theory is worth more
    than mine but I'm not trying to sell mine. It's a freebie. And free advice
    is worth every penny you pay for it, right?

    Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 10 2002 - 03:37:37 GMT