Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA05832 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:27:00 GMT Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:22:19 -0500 Subject: Re: playing at suicide Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <LAW2-F67LQZwbVcxjXH0001c5b7@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <F6434690-0546-11D6-BE9A-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Wednesday, January 9, 2002, at 03:38 , Grant Callaghan wrote:
> If the baby didn't know it had the need, it wouldn't be able to
> express it.
Interesting take on instinctual responses. It certainly is able
to 'express' pain with a scream, as you are.
But, what do you know?
And, what do you need that you screamed?
I see a real difference between someone wanting, say, a new
iMac, and a baby crying because its hungry.
> She knows because the baby communicated the want or need to her.
Is this response, crying, really a communication?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 09 2002 - 21:33:32 GMT