Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA02325 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:11:26 GMT Message-Id: <200201081206.g08C6uB05987@terri.harvard.edu> Subject: RE: CRASH CONTAGION Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:07:00 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Keith Henson -
>They would be far better off
>putting the effort on men and mostly young men at that. You could even
>ignore young guys with a wife or girlfriend and certainly any with their
>children with them.
Sounds like the auto insurance companies' ratings, based on actual
There is way too much of the 'boys will be boys' thing around.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:29:38 GMT