Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA00653 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:02:07 GMT Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:57:17 -0500 Subject: Re: playing at suicide Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <LAW2-F35Zi71mrvoGdK000013b7@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <9B8B4190-038F-11D6-86D7-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Monday, January 7, 2002, at 11:31 , Grant Callaghan wrote:
> That's why I adopt the memetic point of view. It attempts to
> deal with the dynamics of what is going on rather than
> describing a single point in time that will already have passed
> by the time someone gets a chance to study it.
And more power to it. One of these days, it might even know what
is going on.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 17:08:35 GMT