Re: Darwinian Processes and Memes in Architecture

Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:10:14 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Definition please"

    Received: by id SAA13551 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:16:49 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:10:14 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Darwinian Processes and Memes in Architecture
    Message-ID: <3C150896.32609.23C800@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <000b01c1818e$b6650f20$549ebed4@default>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    > << I agree with both of you, expressing your feelings that memetics is
    > misused to get personal gain, some points do need clarification, but I
    > don 't see to which extend the two writers of this piece would gain so
    > much being one a member of a division of mathematics and the other is deep
    > in psychology I suppose.

    Gain does not only mean money. I know that not many on this list
    share my "memes are dna-slaves" paranoia but i think that's
    exactly the reason which stands behind.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:32:10 GMT