Re: Definition please

From: William Benzon (
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 23:22:47 GMT

  • Next message: Ray Recchia: "Re: Darwinian Processes and Memes in Architecture"

    Received: by id XAA09295 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:27:14 GMT
    User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
    Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 18:22:47 -0500
    Subject: Re: Definition please
    From: William Benzon <>
    To: <>
    Message-ID: <>
    In-Reply-To: <003b01c17f55$5a7131c0$d286b2d1@teddace>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Precedence: bulk

    on 12/7/01 2:28 PM, Dace at wrote:


    > Why would you want to say such things? My definition spoke to nervous
    > systems, not systems in general. I don't see why anyone would want to leap
    > to such a conclusion.
    > BB
    > It's a logical point. You've cast your net too widely.
    > The problem is that you can't demonstrate why, if a brain is accompanied by
    > a mind, an electric piano wouldn't have one as well.
    > Where do you draw the line? After all, an electric piano has a kind of
    > nervous system. It has input and output.

    It has no kind of nervous system whatever. You're the one who's cast the
    net too wide & your point has little logic except that of opposition.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 23:33:32 GMT