Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA08471 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:42:47 GMT Message-Id: <200112071437.fB7EbvZ20116@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: RE: The selfish gene meme Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:37:54 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On 12/07/01 08:31, Price, Ilfryn said this-
>> Virtually everyone on this list
>> appears to occupy
>> this space- whether as lay contributors or people who've put
>> themselves into
>> print on such issues like yourself. I wonder why....
>A nice and I presume rhetorical question.
The desire for consilience among the various sciences and disciplines,
social, technical, and artistic, is a dangerous want. It's dangerous to
the heirarchy. It's dangerous to the status quo. It's dangerous to tribal
It's dangerous because it also needs full freedom of disclosure, and it
educates everyone about everything.
The internet, however, is such a strong environment for it, that it just
And it's also dangerously apt to remain unfocused because it needs
vision, and people with overarching vision are few, if not non-existent,
these days, rare as they were ever.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 14:49:09 GMT