Re: Definition please

From: Wade T. Smith (
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 20:56:09 GMT

  • Next message: "Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation"

    Received: by id VAA04827 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:01:28 GMT
    Message-Id: <p0500190cb83439fd9f70@[]>
    In-Reply-To: <001d01c17dca$a9e1d520$2a24f4d8@teddace>
    References: <> <001d01c17dca$a9e1d520$2a24f4d8@teddace>
    Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:56:09 -0500
    From: "Wade T. Smith" <>
    Subject: Re: Definition please
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    Precedence: bulk

    >Science has yet to get clear of the afterbirth that accompanied its delivery
    >some four centuries ago in Christian Europe.

    As long as you continue to think that science is some recently
    instituted bureaucracy, I don't see what progress you could ever find
    it doing.

    IMHO, science is a basic human process of dealing with the universe.
    The correct one, of course, but a basic one.

    Very basic. Caveman basic.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 21:10:47 GMT