Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA03469 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 5 Dec 2001 04:05:04 GMT From: <AaronLynch@aol.com> Message-ID: <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 23:00:08 EST Subject: Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
In a message dated 12/4/2001 6:18:45 AM Central Standard Time, Bill Benzon
> > That said, I will add that if Gell-Mann had made a mess of the word
> > quantum chromodynamics would most likely still have developed, even if
> > a different name. One can think of all sorts of vague ways that Gell-Mann
> > might have coined a word, perhaps referring to almost any subnuclear
> > particle, for instance. But if he had, then physicists would have
> > ignored the term and some other term would have emerged in connection
> > very similar theoretical constructs.
> In the case of culture, what we need is a well-developed body of theory
> about cultural change. The reason "meme" is surrounded with confusion is
> that it doesn't link to any well-developed body of theory. It's just a
> that's analogically attached to a body of biological theory that folks want
> to refit for cultural use. It's the refitting that's difficult.
> Bill B
As we try to develop and communicate some well-developed theories, we will
generally want to use terms that are as unambiguous as possible.
A comparable mess with quarks might have erupted if Gell-Mann first used the
term in a very limited role to try to explain the strong nuclear force, and
then some years later began using the term in substantially different ways
and without explanation to apply to whole different classes of phenomena such
as gravitation or electromagnetism. People would then have had to use
different terminology in their efforts to build broadly unifying theories of
the fundamental forces.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 04:11:22 GMT