Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA03185 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 5 Dec 2001 00:53:08 GMT From: <AaronLynch@aol.com> Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:48:11 EST Subject: Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation To: email@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
In a message dated 12/4/2001 1:48:06 AM Central Standard Time, Joe Dees
> Your points are well taken; they lead me, however to my previous
> that the term 'meme' deserves refinement to something (asymptotically)
> approaching operational consensus rather than extinction.
My interest is not in sending a word into extinction, but in communicating
theory and observation with as little confusion and distraction as possible.
For that purpose, I will for the time being rely on older words that have
moved closer to their semantic asymptotes. The word "meme" may indeed move
closer to some asymptote, in which case it would become more useful for
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 00:59:25 GMT