RE: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation

From: Price, Ilfryn (
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 14:17:00 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Definition please"

    Received: by id PAA02389 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:12:55 GMT
    Message-ID: <>
    From: "Price, Ilfryn" <>
    To: "''" <>
    Subject: RE: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation
    Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:17:00 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Precedence: bulk

    Joe depends what you mean by 'healthy'
    And that would be us. I sincerely doubt, however, that the term is anywhere near archaism; in fact, the 'meme' meme seems to be rather
    robust, which naturally raises the recursive question of how there can be such a healthy 'meme' meme in the absence of memes simpliciter.>

    Fidelity of meaning is not a necessary precursor to replication in the context of this list, unlike say the 'quark' meme replicating in the
    world of high physics.

    IfIf Price
    Facilities Management Graduate Centre
    Sheffield Hallam University
    Unit 7, Science Park, Sheffield S1 1WB
    P +44 [0]114 225 4032
    F +44 [0]114 225 4038
    M +44 [0]7976 422 354

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 04 2001 - 15:19:12 GMT