Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA23972 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:44:31 GMT Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D164@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Verbal memeticism Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:39:53 -0000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
No, who's on second.
> From: Wade T.Smith
> Reply To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:27 am
> To: Memetics Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Verbal memeticism
> Hi Philip A.E. Jonkers -
> >Therefore, everything made by humans is a meme. Although, meme-artifact
> >would be a better qualifier I think.
> It seems a little wiser to put the meme into an artefact than it does to
> put it into a mind.
> Artefacts are a hell of lot easier to find, although we know there's a
> mind in a human's body, uh, somewhere.... Don't we?
> >one does need material to be skeptical about first.
> Who's on first?
> - Wade
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 12:56:42 GMT