Re: Definition, Please

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 02:38:40 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "plugs"

    Received: by id CAA22853 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 02:43:38 GMT
    Subject: Re: Definition, Please
    Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:38:40 -0500
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Philip A.E. Jonkers -

    >> Human
    >> evolution requires sexual reproduction, and the only way memetic
    >> evolution could happen would require a sexual component as well.
    >Biological evolution does not require sexual reproduction per se, that's
    >a subtle misconception.

    Just to nitpick, I never said biological evolution requires sex, I said
    human evolution does.

    And, right now, that's true. It might not be in a few.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 03:00:56 GMT