Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA20343 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:57:27 GMT Subject: the hook Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:52:26 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20011129025226.AAA14843@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
I think my time is up, debate-wise, here from the
only-artefacts-are-memes stance. Time to sit down and soak up much more
from the audience. I didn't have a predilection for either side, nor any
emotional attachment, nor any belief one way or the other. I am a
skeptic, and look for balance from all sides. I wasn't seeing much of a
balance for the Gatherer position, so I jumped up on that side of the
seesaw. I liked the view. (But, I liked the view from the memes in the
mind side, too, and, from the fulcrum in the middle, where things quantum
tunnel from one side to the other.)
Besides, in any debate, there's supposed to be a team.
All the world's a stage.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 03:09:01 GMT