Re: circular logic

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 02:19:11 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: A Question for Wade"

    Received: by id CAA20250 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:24:13 GMT
    Subject: Re: circular logic
    Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:19:11 -0500
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >Not only does it have intention, but that intention plays a part in
    >selection the further memetic selection with which it engages its ideosphere.

    Intention is often laid aside, as in "should've's". And intentions are
    laid down in laws that are barely enforced much less adhered to.

    And often, intentions produce babies, although, selection (from a very
    good olfactory experiment where women chose 'good mates') might prefer a
    good whiff first, and neglect the well-intentioned, but off-smelling,
    choice of the matchmaker.

    Chauffers get theirs.

    Intention remains, for me, problematic.

    And yet, I've stood on principle several times, with very definite
    negative outcomes, both to my pocketbook and my esteem, in this culture.

    And, I fully intended to fall in love, and, a few times, I have.

    Wishes and hopes.

    - Wade


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 02:30:19 GMT