Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA20006 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:24:43 GMT Subject: Re: Mutation and Selection Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:19:45 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20011129011945.AAA4711@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Philip A.E. Jonkers -
>We first should arrive at some consensus on what definition is
>appropriate for the meme such that it also incorporates also
>those synaptic configurations in the brain that ultimately give rise to
That sounds more like Microsoft's way of settling a case than anything
Not a, hmmm, you might be right, but, a hmmm, no matter if you're right
or not, the only way out is through our door.
What synaptic configurations? Without uniform representation (Gatherer's
plausible point) where are we? There have been solid inroads in
neurobiology (hell, I post a few here) that have done much, but, so far,
have done much to underscore the sociobiologist, not the memeticist.
Certain regions of the brain do seem to do certain things, but, we
haven't changed biologically in millennia.
But, I grant, it would be a tremendous help to know more.
So, do we just wait around for a few decades until your settlement can
possibly come to fruit?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 01:31:07 GMT