Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA19360 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:34:26 GMT Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:28:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <ED4FD602-E446-11D5-86B0-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.475) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Is it necessary for memetics to become useful?
I think so. That's why I'm trying to arrive at utility.
> The last book with this special story can just become distinct
> as the last storyteller telling the story.
The last storyteller is like but unlike the last book. Once he
is gone, there is no dusty shelf upon which he was put. The last
book can be found again, perhaps, but the last storyteller is
gone when he's gone, irretrievable. Like lost languages.
Or have you found a lost language recently?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 21:50:00 GMT