Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA19290 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:18:35 GMT Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:13:03 -0500 Subject: Re: circular logic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <B5D6E582-E444-11D5-86B0-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.475) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >Evolution does not imitate. It selects.
> And in the case of memetics it selects what to imitate.
Evolution has selected species with proclivities for imitative
behaviors, yes. But imitation is _not_ a process of evolution,
and I haven't a clue why anyone would suppose it could be,
unless they are lamarckians, huh?
Therefore, if memetics is applying the evolutionary paradigm to
culture, imitation should not be a consideration. Again, unless
lamarckianism enters their purview.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 21:26:48 GMT