Re: circular logic

From: Wade Smith (
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:25:31 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: circular logic"

    Received: by id QAA18644 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:31:02 GMT
    Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:25:31 -0500
    Subject: Re: circular logic
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: Wade Smith <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.475)
    Precedence: bulk

    > Maybe it's time you gave us your definition of "imitate", because it's
    > obviously not the one in common use.

    Here it is then- To copy the actions, appearance, mannerisms, or
    speech of; mimic.

    And evolution doesn't do any of those things.

    And memetics is an evolutionary paradigm.

    Imitation means nothing to memetics.


    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:52:35 GMT