Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA15467 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:20:31 GMT Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:14:54 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20011127141529.AAA4739@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 11/27/01 04:41, Robin Faichney said this-
>> Ah. But they use it too- and they mutate it via their use.
>> Otherwise, all memetics would be is cloning, and it ain't.
>So now you're admitting there is imitation?
I don't really know the trap you're attempting to set, because, I've
reread my statement so much I can't trust my eyes anymore, but, I swear
it doesn't mention imitation even once.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 14:31:30 GMT