Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA14608 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 27 Nov 2001 04:23:06 GMT Message-ID: <005e01c176fa$a77be220$8788b2d1@teddace> From: "Dace" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com> References: <F230nHAaaz7EjQxzmWe000002b8@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:19:03 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
> One would think that the level of similarity between humans and chimps
> mean there are some homologies in behavior. What about tool usage? Does
> apparent similarity stem from common ancestry or merely from convergence
> to similar adaptive problems? Either way, when do "memes" enter the
Memes are mental organisms. But they're not primary examples of this form.
They didn't launch the kingdom of autonomous mentalia. They're the
offspring of other mental creatures known as human beings.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 04:48:37 GMT