Re: A Question for Wade

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 01:08:16 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: A Question for Wade"

    Received: by id BAA11555 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 01:13:18 GMT
    Subject: Re: A Question for Wade
    Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:08:16 -0500
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >Accident and serendipity has not played the sole role here, by any
    >reasonable interpretation of human history.

    Didn't say they did- far from it. Skill sets and experience,
    communication and culture, schools and groups- all a part, as you mention.

    What I am insisting upon declaring (all for the moment to see how far it
    carries me, and so far, it's carrying me way further than anything else
    has) is that only the actual product of these combines is the only thing
    that can be called a meme.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 26 2001 - 01:29:30 GMT