Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA11493 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 26 Nov 2001 01:04:14 GMT Subject: Re: A Question for Wade Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:59:15 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20011126005913.AAA4079@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Joe Dees -
>since a meme may be represented in many different ways in any particular
>medium, and may be represented in many different media, but the connection
>between the patterns, as differing representamens, and the idea or
>concept, as referent.
Form being function, and the medium being the message, I fail to see how
a meme can be represented in many different ways in many media. Reductio
to the absurd, that sort of makes everything the same as everything else,
Maybe this is more communications theory (but, ain't I already come down
on the side of throwing out anything besides the actual physical artifact
itself as being a meme- yup, I did...), but, please, bring out this meme
that may be represented (and what does it mean to represent a meme any
bloody way?!) in any media.
I really don't think I've thrown out the baby with the bathwater by
declaring as erroneous any meme theory that uses meme in any other way
than as actual physical artifact- for while I agree the bathwater was
terrifically filthy, the baby itself was in the bassinet.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 26 2001 - 01:10:23 GMT