Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA08958 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:08:21 GMT Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:03:14 +0000 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Message-ID: <20011124190314.B705@ii01.org> References: <20011124000023.AAA26741@email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011124000023.AAA26741@firstname.lastname@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i From: Robin Faichney <email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:00:27PM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> Imitation, to me, requires volition.
I was guessing it would. But I think that's a mistake. Of course,
as I keep finding myself having to say, you can use the word any way
you want, but I think you'll find in this context, the way the word's
generally used, repetiton of an observed behavioural pattern counts as
imitation regardless of intent.
-- Robin Faichney "One person's mess is another's complexity" inside information -- http://www.ii01.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 19:20:46 GMT