Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA06989 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:10:12 GMT Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:47:49 +0000 To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Message-ID: <20011123184749.A789@ii01.org> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D147@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D147@inchna.stir.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 04:04:37PM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
> I wouldn't say one's native language is imitated so much as learned.
Don't you think imitation plays a large part in such learning?
-- Robin Faichney "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here: http://www.ii01.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 19:16:02 GMT