Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA05156 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:23:00 GMT Message-ID: <000d01c17393$7d4efd80$baa6bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <email@example.com> References: <001001c16c62$3552d3e0$3524f4d8@teddace><firstname.lastname@example.org><00a301c1718e$93982140$6824f4d8@teddace> <0111211504020D.email@example.com> Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:22:27 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
The only intrinsic
> quality that makes us really original lies in our crude genetically based
> predispositions or preferences to memes. This is genetically determined.
> Separately raised identical twins showing remarkable resemblance in
> predispositions, flavors and preferences testify of that.
> Genes give you the slay featuring raw biases, the personal memetic
> history fills in the rest, which defines the very nature of humans.
> Together with our genetically determined set of raw biases makes each
> human unique
<< Why should the preference to memes be genetically based !?
The preference to memes can be the result of a series of major transitions
of making more permanent brainconnections_ there are no genes acquired
to do that !
That genes ( could and will play a role) I agree, but if anything can be
said_ meme preference can be the result of a self- organisation- process
whereby according to Prigogine ' the product of a chemical reaction can
be implicated in its own synthesis.'
That means in a sense, that chemical processes were balancing between
chance and necessity, between fluctuations and determinations.
That in fact " memes " or were they still ' genes ' collapsed and made
Thoughts were thoughts in those times and nomore as such_ memes
began when those thoughts were implicated in themselves, they evolved
some kind degree of reflection.
Thoughts were simply the result of genetic based chemical processes,
after the collapse they were biased on their own.
According to Darwinian simplicity, genes were overall the fittest and
there was no reason to let evolve memes.
The most adapted ( genes) would have won every time the race, that is
not the case_ memes emerged. Why !?
Because the cumulationprocess whereby thoughts were placed one above
the other reached a critical phase and collapsed. In some sense, the brain
chemisty collapsed under its own genetic doing and produced memes.
Sound strange and far- fetched I know, but the existence of memes is
ruling out the Darwinian view. One, genes or memes, will be in the end
the fittest, and according to Darwinian laws one had to pay the piper
already a big amount of money to stay around, and we know neither
paid a price (yet).
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 22 2001 - 20:28:51 GMT