Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA04852 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:58:22 GMT Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:53:20 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20011122165317.AAA20486@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Robin Faichney -
>memetics is entirely mechanistic and deterministic.
Okay, since I do understand that point (and, yeah, I am meandering amidst
the points, with no ascertainment of my own in this arena, as you've
seen), accepting it would seem to reduce it to meaninglessness, as it
merely becomes a description of a facet of another, more reductionist,
mechanism, namely evolutionary adaptation in the form of sexual genetic
Which only makes it a process.
Which may be acceptable as a descriptor, but, IMHO, it makes the meme
Which is perhaps as it should be.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 22 2001 - 17:04:21 GMT