Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA12703 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sun, 11 Nov 2001 01:32:07 GMT From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work... Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 02:23:21 +0100 (CET) References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 18.104.22.168 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Quoting "Wade T. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Hi Philip --
> Now, I know I'm not replying to the main subject of your post, but,
> some obvious reasons, I happen to know that it's 'smithereens'....
> But, just for the fun of it, take a look at http://skepdic.com/
> astrolgy.html , where my favorite line is - "I can only conclude that
> astrologers have more influence than the stars do."
> (And if'n you want, also at http://home.wxs.nl/~skepsis/astrot.html ,
> which is a website of one of the #skeptics on Starchat.)
Many thanks Wade for these beautiful references. It seems the holders
of the sites leave room for my hypothesis. Therefore, I would like to know
their opinions and I have sent them, of which one is Dutch by the way, an
email containing my hypothesis.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 11 2001 - 01:37:50 GMT