Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work...

From: Wade T. Smith (
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 01:06:46 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Bin Laden's Statement"

    Received: by id BAA10996 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:15:21 GMT
    From: "Wade T. Smith" <>
    To: <>
    Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work...
    Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:06:46 -0500
    Message-Id: <>
    In-Reply-To: <>
    References: <>
    X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.0.9v2 <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Philip --


    Now, I know I'm not replying to the main subject of your post, but, for
    some obvious reasons, I happen to know that it's 'smithereens'....

    But, just for the fun of it, take a look at
    astrolgy.html , where my favorite line is - "I can only conclude that
    astrologers have more influence than the stars do."

    (And if'n you want, also at ,
    which is a website of one of the #skeptics on Starchat.)

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 10 2001 - 01:21:03 GMT