Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA10996 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:15:21 GMT From: "Wade T. Smith" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work... Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:06:46 -0500 Message-Id: <email@example.com> In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <email@example.com> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.0.9v2 <http://www.ctmdev.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Philip --
Now, I know I'm not replying to the main subject of your post, but, for
some obvious reasons, I happen to know that it's 'smithereens'....
But, just for the fun of it, take a look at http://skepdic.com/
astrolgy.html , where my favorite line is - "I can only conclude that
astrologers have more influence than the stars do."
(And if'n you want, also at http://home.wxs.nl/~skepsis/astrot.html ,
which is a website of one of the #skeptics on Starchat.)
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 10 2001 - 01:21:03 GMT